What is Open-AutoGLM?
Open-AutoGLM is an open-source phone agent that can interpret an Android screen and execute tasks. This guide focuses on what it is, how it differs from chatbots, and how to evaluate it safely without overstating capabilities.
GUI agents vs chatbots
Chatbots operate on text inputs and return text outputs. GUI agents operate in a visual environment. They see screens, identify UI elements, and take actions (tap, type, scroll) to complete tasks. The Open-AutoGLM paper defines GUI agents in this broader sense; use it as the source of truth for terminology and scope. TODO: add the official paper URL and citation.
Key differences:
- Perception: GUI agents rely on screen understanding, not just text prompts.
- Action: GUI agents operate UI controls, not APIs.
- Context: GUI agents must handle changing layouts, loading states, and confirmation dialogs.
- Safety: GUI agents need extra guardrails to avoid destructive actions.
Project origins & authors
- Official GitHub org: zai-org (official source).
- Paper: TODO: add official paper URL.
If author or company details are not explicit in official sources, treat the project as maintained by the contributors listed in the repo and paper. TODO: confirm authorship details from official sources.
Why open source
If the official README or paper states a clear rationale, use that and cite it. If not, these are the neutral benefits to know:
- Transparency in how the agent makes decisions.
- Reproducible setups for evaluation and research.
- Community-driven improvements and debugging.
TODO: confirm any stated rationale in official sources.
Why we cover Open-AutoGLM
- Open source, inspectable workflows.
- Clear documentation and a reproducible pipeline.
- Strong baseline for GUI agent evaluation.
- Independent, safety-focused coverage (not affiliated with the original authors).
Who uses it & example use cases
These are example use cases, not claims of real adoption:
- Researchers: baseline evaluation for phone-use agents.
- QA engineers: regression checks on onboarding flows.
- Product teams: validating cross-app workflows.
- Accessibility testers: verifying UI text and contrast changes.
Example scenarios (not endorsements):
- Regression testing on login and settings flows.
- Onboarding walkthroughs for new users.
- Cross-app data entry with confirmation prompts.
- UI text and visual checks after a redesign.
- Device setup routines that require confirmations.
- Safe task automation with human approval checkpoints.
- Capturing failure cases for bug reporting.
Alternatives if you don't use Open-AutoGLM
- Deterministic UI automation: Appium, UIAutomator/Espresso for Android testing.
- Web-only automation: Playwright or Selenium for browser flows.
- Manual QA: scripted or exploratory testing without agents.
Deterministic tools are predictable and easier to verify, but they can be more brittle across UI changes. Agentic tools are flexible but require stricter safety checks.
Alternatives matrix
| Approach | Best for | Strengths | Limitations | When to choose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-AutoGLM | Visual Android workflows | Flexible across UI layouts | Higher safety burden | When UI varies and human review is needed |
| Appium/UIAutomator | Deterministic Android tests | Repeatable, strict assertions | Brittle on UI changes | When stability and precision matter most |
| Playwright/Selenium | Web-only flows | Mature web tooling | Not suitable for native apps | When testing web apps only |
| Manual QA | Exploratory testing | Human judgment | Time-intensive | When coverage is small or exploratory |
Waitlist
Mobile Regression Testing (coming soon)
Get notified when guided Android regression testing workflows and safety checklists are ready.
We only use your email for the waitlist. You can opt out anytime.